Correlated Hypothesizing and the Distinction between Contingency-Shaped and Rule-Governed Behavior

  • Hineline P
  • Wanchisen B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

(from the preface) The rubric for much of this work has been an interest in rule-governed behavior. Rule-governed behavior in this sense does not refer to general strategies of performance that can be stated in rule form. Rather, it is behavior that is directly impacted by verbal formulae. What that means, how to conceptualize it, how to study it, how it fits in with other psychological processes, what it means for clinical interventions with adult humans--these are the topics dealt with in this volume. /// The present volume spans a wide variety of topics and perspectives. /// The first four chapters, then, give a view of current behavioral theory and research on rule-governance and place this work into a larger historical and intellectual context. The four chapters that follow are more speculative and theoretical. /// The final two chapters deal with the implications of rule-governance for applied psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hineline, P. N., & Wanchisen, B. A. (1989). Correlated Hypothesizing and the Distinction between Contingency-Shaped and Rule-Governed Behavior. In Rule-Governed Behavior (pp. 221–268). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0447-1_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free