Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal (and sometimes non-verbal) communicative moves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eemeren, F. H. (2015). Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 27, pp. 575–594). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free