Treatment of lupus nephritis: consensus, evidence and perspectives

20Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite the continuing development of immunomodulatory agents and supportive care, the prognosis associated with lupus nephritis (LN) has not improved substantially in the past decade, with end-stage kidney disease still developing in 5–30% of patients within 10 years of LN diagnosis. Moreover, inter-ethnic variation in the tolerance of, clinical response to and level of evidence regarding various therapeutic regimens for LN has led to variation in treatment prioritization in different international recommendations. Modalities that better preserve kidney function and reduce the toxicities of concomitant glucocorticoids are unmet needs in the development of therapeutics for LN. In addition to the conventional recommended therapies for LN, there are newly approved treatments as well as investigational drugs in the pipeline, including the newer generation calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents. In view of the heterogeneity of LN in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis, the choice of therapies depends on a number of clinical considerations. Molecular profiling, gene-signature fingerprints and urine proteomic panels might enhance the accuracy of patient stratification for treatment personalization in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mok, C. C., Teng, Y. K. O., Saxena, R., & Tanaka, Y. (2023, April 1). Treatment of lupus nephritis: consensus, evidence and perspectives. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-023-00925-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free