ANALISIS KONFLIK KONI DAN KOI TERKAIT TUGAS DAN FUNGSI BERDASARKAN UU NO. 3 TAHUN 2005 MENGENAI SISTEM KEOLAHRAGAAN NASIONAL

Abstract

Thisstu d y d e s c rib e d a b o ut c onfli c tb e tw ee nK O N I a ndK O Ir e la t e dtotask a nd fun c t i on acc o rdi n g to U UNo.3Y e a r2005 a b o utN a t i on a l S port S y s t e m.Thisstu d y d e s c rib e d a bout c a us e sofre g ulationpubl i shm e nt, ca us e s o f c o n fli c t, t y peof c onfli c t, the c onfli c t’si m p ac ts,man a g e ments a nd a lso c onstr a in t sinsolv i ng the c onfli c t.This stu d yis qu a l i tative re s ea r c h whosed e s c riptived e s i g n. R e sultofth i sstu d y isth i s c onfli c t c a nbe c a t e g ori z e d a sin t e ro r g a ni z a t i on a l c onfli c twhoseh o ri z ontal c h a r ac te r. S our c e s o f c onfli c t a r estru c t u re oforg a ni z a t i on, re g ulation, a nd a lsobu d g e t i n g. A cc o rdingtoD a h r e ndor f ’s t h e o r y, c onfli c tb e tw ee ntwo org a ni z a t i onsh a dstru c tur a lsour ce ss u c h a sthe q u e st i onof pow e r l e g i t i m a c y.Ho w e v e r, e v e r y c o n fli c t has a c h a n g e. Thisr e s ea r c hg a ve s e v e r a lr e c om m e nd a t i onsinman a g ing c onfli c t. F irstof a l l, p a rtofso c ie t y,including theo r g a ni z a t i onthatinvo l v e d i n c onfli c t,prop o s e dar e vise tow a rd U U. No.3 Y e a r2005thro u g h J udici a lR e view P r o ce ssinConsti t ut i on a lCourt (M K). S ec ond,standi n gonUUNo.3Y e a r 2 005butdoing s y n c hr o ni z a t i on a nd c oordin a t i on w a y in d e r i v a t i ve re g ulation.Third,publ i shingan e w r e g u l a t i onthatrul e s a bouts e ndingof a th l e t e stoin t e rn a t i on a l e v e ntsincludingmakings a mequ a l i fi ca t i on a nds a mestand a rd both s e nding a nd e v a luation. T hisr e s e a r c h a lsor e c om m e nd tomake ta r g e t of c h a n g e a nd usingb e h a vior a l s t r a t e g yto c onv e rt the c o nfli c t. K e y W o r d s: Confli c t, C h a ng e, R e g ulation A B S TRAC T Thisstu d y d e s c rib e d a b o ut c onfli c tb e tw ee nK O N I a ndK O Ir e la t e dtotask a nd fun c t i on acc o rdi n g to U UNo.3Y e a r2005 a b o utN a t i on a l S port S y s t e m.Thisstu d y d e s c rib e d a bout c a us e sofre g ulationpubl i shm e nt, ca us e s o f c o n fli c t, t y peof c onfli c t, the c onfli c t’si m p ac ts,man a g e ments a nd a lso c onstr a in t sinsolv i ng the c onfli c t.This stu d yis qu a l i tative re s ea r c h whosed e s c riptived e s i g n. R e sultofth i sstu d y isth i s c onfli c t c a nbe c a t e g ori z e d a sin t e ro r g a ni z a t i on a l c onfli c twhoseh o ri z ontal c h a r ac te r. S our c e s o f c onfli c t a r estru c t u re oforg a ni z a t i on, re g ulation, a nd a lsobu d g e t i n g. A cc o rdingtoD a h r e ndor f ’s t h e o r y, c onfli c tb e tw ee ntwo org a ni z a t i onsh a dstru c tur a lsour ce ss u c h a sthe q u e st i onof pow e r l e g i t i m a c y.Ho w e v e r, e v e r y c o n fli c t has a c h a n g e. Thisr e s ea r c hg a ve s e v e r a lr e c om m e nd a t i onsinman a g ing c onfli c t. F irstof a l l, p a rtofso c ie t y,including theo r g a ni z a t i onthatinvo l v e d i n c onfli c t,prop o s e dar e vise tow a rd U U. No.3 Y e a r2005thro u g h J udici a lR e view P r o ce ssinConsti t ut i on a lCourt (M K). S ec ond,standi n gonUUNo.3Y e a r 2 005butdoing s y n c hr o ni z a t i on a nd c oordin a t i on w a y in d e r i v a t i ve re g ulation.Third,publ i shingan e w r e g u l a t i onthatrul e s a bouts e ndingof a th l e t e stoin t e rn a t i on a l e v e ntsincludingmakings a mequ a l i fi ca t i on a nds a mestand a rd both s e nding a nd e v a luation. T hisr e s e a r c h a lsor e c om m e nd tomake ta r g e t of c h a n g e a nd usingb e h a vior a l s t r a t e g yto c onv e rt the c o nfli c t. K e y W o r d s: Confli c t, C h a ng e, R e g ulation