Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical intervention for management of spinal instability after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians requires a clear consensus on optimal treatments. This study aimed to provide a guide for more efficient management through comparison and assessment of clinical outcomes and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate (pACDF) and posterior decompression fusion (PDF) instrumentation alone in patients aged 80 years. Methods: A single institution retrospective review of electronic medical records was undertaken between September 2005 and December 2021. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors for ACDF complications. Results: The rate of comorbidities were similarly high between the pACDF (n=13) and PDF (n=15) groups (pACDF: 8.7 ± 2.4 points vs. 8.5 ± 2.3 points; p=0.555). Patients in the PDF group had significantly longer surgical duration (235 ± 58.4 min vs. 182.5 ± 32.1 min; p<0.001) and significantly higher volumes of intraoperative blood loss (661.5 ± 100.1 mL vs. 487.5 ± 92.1 mL; p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality was 7.7% for the pACDF group and 6.7% for the PDF group. On day 90, the mortality rate increased in both groups from baseline (pACDF: 15.4% vs. PDF: 13.3; p>0.05). Motor scores (MS) improved significantly after surgery in both groups (pACDF: preOP MS: 75.3 ± 11.1 vs. postOP MS: 82.4 ± 10.1; p<0.05; PDF: preOP MS: 80.7 ± 16.7 vs. postOP MS: 89.5 ± 12.1; p<0.05). Statistically significant predictors for postoperative complications included longer operative times (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1–2.1; p=0.005) and larger volume of blood loss (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.2; p=0.003). Conclusions: Both pACDF and PDF can be considered safe treatment strategies for octogenarians with a poor baseline profile and subaxial fractures as they lead to patients substantial neurological improvements, and they are accompanied with low morbidity and mortality rates. Operation duration and intraoperative blood loss should be minimized to increase the degree of neurological recovery in octogenarian patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lenga, P., Gülec, G., Kiening, K., Unterberg, A. W., & Ishak, B. (2023). Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate versus posterior screw fixation after traumatic subaxial fractures in octogenarians: complications and outcomes with a 2-year follow-up. Acta Neurochirurgica, 165(5), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05566-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free