Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Results from GABI-R

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in everyday practice in the large-scale German-Austrian ABSORB Registry (GABI-R). Methods and results: Between November 2013 and January 2016, 3,264 patients underwent BVS implantation in the 93 centres of GABI-R (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066623). At six-month follow-up, 24 patients experienced clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (cTLR) unrelated to BVS thrombosis (cumulative incidence 0.76%; angiographically, 58.3% of in-BVS restenosis of focal pattern). Compared to patients without cTLR, patients with cTLR had more lesions per patient (1.83±1.0 vs. 1.36±0.7), complex (52.3% vs. 36.2%) and mild-to-moderately calcified lesions (65.9% vs. 60.5%) treated, and more frequently had overlapping BVS (22.2% vs. 10.8%), all p<0.05. Implanted BVS length was 40.0 mm (28.0, 46.9) vs. 23.0 mm (18.0, 30.0), p<0.001, remaining in the multivariable analysis the only independent predictor of cTLR (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p<0.001). The myocardial infarction rate was also significantly higher among patients with cTLR, 29.2% vs. 1.7%, p<0.0001. Conclusions: cTLR related to BVS restenosis at six months after BVS implantation is a rare event depending on implanted BVS length. Whether cTLR increases the myocardial infarction risk needs to be evaluated at longer-term follow-up and within the setting of adequately powered randomised trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mehilli, J., Achenbach, S., Wöhrle, J., Baquet, M., Riemer, T., Münzel, T., … Hamm, C. (2017). Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Results from GABI-R. EuroIntervention, 13(11), 1320–1327. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free