Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: A systematic review

155Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-neoformans cryptococci have been generally regarded as saprophytes and rarely reported as human pathogens. However, the incidence of infection due to these organisms has increased over the past 40 years, with Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus, together, responsible for 80% of reported cases. Conditions associated with impaired cell-mediated immunity are important risks for non-neoformans cryptococcal infections and prior azole prophylaxis has been associated with antifungal resistance. The presence of invasive devices was a significant risk factor for Cryptococcus laurentii infection (adjusted OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 1.48-82.9; p = 0.003), while predictors for mortality included age ≥45 years (aOR = 8.4; 95% CI = 1.18-78.82; p = 0.004) and meningeal presentation (aOR = 7.0; 95% CI = 1.85-60.5; p= 0.04). Because clinical manifestations of non-neoformans cryptococcal infections are most often indistinguishable from Cryptococcus neoformans, a high index of suspicion remains important to facilitate early diagnosis and prompt treatment for such infections. © 2007 Urban & Vogel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khawcharoenporn, T., Apisarnthanarak, A., & Mundy, L. M. (2007, April). Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: A systematic review. Infection. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-007-6142-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free