ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PRABUMULIH NOMOR: 25/PID. B/2021/PN/PBM)

  • Sanjaya S
  • Amalia R
  • Affreddyan A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstrak Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah, bagaimana analisa hakim didalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana kepada terdakwa apakah telah memenuhi unsur keadilan, baik terhadap keluarga korban maupun terhadap pelaku itu sendiri. Faktor-faktor apa saja yang menjadi pertimbangan majelis hakim Pengadilan Negeri Prabumulih dalam menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Nomor: 25/Pid.B/2021/PN Pbm terhadap tindak pidana pembunuhan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Yuridis Normatif (Legal Research), pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), pendekatan Kasus (Case Approach). Hakim dalam menjalankan kekuasaan kehakimannya wajib menafsirkan hukum demi rasa keadilan masyarakat dan menemukan atau menafsirkan hukum sesuai dengan rasa keadilan dalam masyarakat itu, sebab hakim tidak terlepas dari masyarakat dimana ia berada dalam melakukan tugasnya. Sebagai penegak hukum, hakim mempunyai tugas dibidang yudisial, yaitu menerima, memeriksa, memutus dan menyelesaikan setiap perkara yang diajukan kepadanya.   Kata Kunci: Hakim, Putusan, Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan   Abstract The problem raised in this study is how the judge's analysis in imposing criminal sanctions on the defendant has fulfilled the elements of justice, both to the victim's family and to the perpetrator himself. What factors were taken into consideration by the judges of the Prabumulih District Court in passing the Criminal Decision Number: 25/Pid.B/2021/PN Pbm against the crime of murder. The methods used in this research are normative juridical (Legal Research), the statute approach and the conceptual approach, the case approach. Judges in exercising their judicial power are obliged to interpret the law for the sake of the community's sense of justice and find or interpret the law in accordance with the sense of justice in that society, because judges cannot be separated from the community where they are in performing their duties. As law enforcers, judges have a duty in the judicial field, namely to receive, examine, decide and settle every case submitted to him.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanjaya, S., Amalia, R. F., Affreddyan, A., Roby, R., & Butar, D. B. (2022). ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PRABUMULIH NOMOR: 25/PID. B/2021/PN/PBM). Lexstricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i1.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free