The TCR Vβ signature of bacterial superantigens spreads with stimulus strength

31Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Superantigens (Sags) induce large-scale stimulation of T lymphocytes by a mechanism distinct from conventional antigen presentation, involving direct MHC binding and stimulation of TCR families based on Vβ gene usage. The specific Vβ targets of a given Sag have, since the earliest studies in murine models, been considered a hallmark of that toxin. Bacterial Sags are implicated in the aetiology of a wide range of human diseases, although their role has been most clearly defined in toxic shock syndrome. While Sags have been defined by the Vβ-specific changes in T cell repertoire they induce, human studies of in vitro stimulation or analysis of cells from infected patients have produced inconsistent findings. Here we have evaluated the contribution of HLA allelic polymorphisms and strength of stimulus to this response. We show that there are differences in binding and presentation of the staphylococcal Sag, staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA), by different HLA-DR alleles. We also show that the TCR Vβ response, previously thought to be a fixed property defining a given Sag, varies with stimulus strength such that a broader repertoire of response is seen at higher concentrations or following presentation by high-binding class II types. Responses of human Vβ8 and Vβ1 to SEA, Vβ5 to SEB and of Vβ12 and Vβ13 to streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A are absolutely dependent on stimulus strength. These findings have important implications for heterogeneity in the response to Sags and the consequent differences in susceptibility to severe toxic shock. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Llewelyn, M., Sriskandan, S., Terrazzini, N., Cohen, J., & Altmann, D. M. (2006). The TCR Vβ signature of bacterial superantigens spreads with stimulus strength. International Immunology, 18(10), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxl076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free