Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies

91Citations
Citations of this article
218Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has spread with increased fatalities around the world and has become an international public health crisis. Public health authorities in many countries have introduced contact tracing apps to track and trace infected persons as part of measures to contain the spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2. However, there are major concerns about its efficacy and privacy which affects mass acceptance amongst a population. This systematic literature review encompasses the current challenges facing this technology and recommendations to address such challenges in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in neo-liberal societies. Methods: The systematic literature review was conducted by searching databases of Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect using the search terms (“Contact Tracing” OR “Contact Tracing apps”) AND (“COVID-19” OR “Coronavirus”) to identify relevant literature. The searches were run against the title, keywords, or abstract, depending on the search platforms. The searches were conducted between January 1, 2020, through 31st January 2021. Further inputs were also taken from preprints, published government and technical reports. We explore and discuss from the selected literature, the key challenges and issues that influence unwillingness to use these contact tracing apps in neo-liberal societies which include the plausibility of abuse of user privacy rights and lack of trust in the government and public health authorities by their citizens. Other challenges identified and discussed include ethical issues, security vulnerabilities, user behaviour and participation, and technical constraints. Results and conclusion: Finally, in the analysis of this systematic literature review, recommendations to address these challenges, future directions, and considerations in the use of digital contact tracing apps and related technologies to contain the spread of future pandemic outbreaks are presented. For policy makers in neo-liberal societies, this study provides an in-depth review of issues that must be addressed. We highlight recommendations to improve the willingness to use such digital technologies and could facilitate mass acceptance amongst users.

References Powered by Scopus

Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study

3156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19

3052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study

1749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems

270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Personal carbon allowances revisited

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of mobile apps and fitness trackers to promote healthy behaviors during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akinbi, A., Forshaw, M., & Blinkhorn, V. (2021, December 1). Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies. Health Information Science and Systems. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

55%

Researcher 17

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 26

43%

Social Sciences 17

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free