Asymmetrical triadic relationship based on the structural difficulty: A Bayesian approach for balance theory

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using Bayesian inference, this study aims to estimate the magnitude of the cognitive load when a person perceives asymmetric social relations. Some empirical evidence relating to balance theory has shown that a balanced state is comparatively easier to memorize than an unbalanced one. In this study, since a balanced state is defined by structural complexity, an experimental hypothesis was set whereby asymmetric social relationships have different difficulty levels depending on structural complexity. The balanced state of an asymmetric relation as structural difficulty is formally derived from the eigenvalue structure of a Hermitian matrix. Asymmetric triadic relations are modeled as featuring three kinds of structural difficulties according to the eigenvalue decomposition of the Hermitian matrix and pattern-specific difficulties. The differences among the structural difficulties were not sufficiently significant to exceed pattern-specific difficulties, but the Bayes factor of the informational hypothesis of this research yielded positive effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kosugi, K. E. (2018). Asymmetrical triadic relationship based on the structural difficulty: A Bayesian approach for balance theory. Behaviormetrika, 45(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-017-0033-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free