Satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section at Tembisa Hospital, South Africa: a cross-sectional study

7Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The most recommended type of anaesthesia by many obstetric guidelines for Caesarean section (CS) is spinal anaesthesia. This to achieve a higher level of pain and comfort control for the patient during and after CS. Little scientific research has assessed mothers’ satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the maternity unit of Tembisa Hospital, South Africa in March 2014. Results: Overall satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia was 77.1%. The mean age (SD) was 27.9 (5.8) years. CS was mostly done as an emergency 63 (76.8%). The level of satisfaction varied greatly. There was a linear regression between age and answer scores regarding preoperative explanations (r = 0.2. R-squared = 0.05, p-value of 0.03. There was an association between preoperative explanations and gravidity (OR 13.1; CL 95%; CI 1.9–41.7; p = 0.0018). In perioperative time, elective CS was associated with verbal communication with the doctor administrating the spinal anaesthesia (OR 13.5; CL 95% CI 0.7–237.3; p = 0.0017). Pain at the injection site of lumbar puncture (OR 4; CL 95% CI 1.2–13; p = 0.025) and the atmosphere in the theatre (OR 4.1; CL 95% CI 1.1–15.5; p = 0.02) were determinant for future choice of spinal anaesthesia. Conclusion: Integrating pre-anaesthesia explanations in antenatal care and pre-anaesthesia counselling during labour and the use of adequate medication to reduce discomfort, pain and shivering may increase maternal satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia for CS.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Makoko, U. M., Modiba, L. M., & Nzaumvila, D. K. (2019). Satisfaction with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section at Tembisa Hospital, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. South African Family Practice, 61(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2018.1531585

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free