Stem Cell Theory of Cancer: Rude Awakening or Bad Dream from Cancer Dormancy?

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To be dormant or not depends on the origin and nature of both the cell and its niche. Similar to other cancer hallmarks, dormancy is ingrained with stemness, and stemness is embedded within dormancy. After all, cancer dormancy is dependent on multiple factors such as cell cycle arrest, metabolic inactivity, and the microenvironment. It is the net results and sum effects of a myriad of cellular interactions, interconnections, and interplays. When we unite all cancer networks and integrate all cancer hallmarks, we practice and preach a unified theory of cancer. From this perspective, we review cancer dormancy in the context of a stem cell theory of cancer. We revisit the seed and soil hypothesis of cancer. We reexamine its implications in both primary tumors and metastatic lesions. We reassess its roles in cell cycle arrest, metabolic inactivity, and stemness property. Cancer dormancy is particularly revealing when it informs us about the mysteries of late re-lapse, prolonged remission, and second malignancy. It is paradoxically rewarding when it delivers us the promises and power of cancer prevention and maintenance therapy in patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tu, S. M., Estecio, M. R., Lin, S. H., & Zacharias, N. M. (2022). Stem Cell Theory of Cancer: Rude Awakening or Bad Dream from Cancer Dormancy? Cancers, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030655

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free