Urban conflict: Reterritorialization in Northern part of Bekasi

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Inter-group conflict is one of the crucial issues affecting urban development in Northern part of Bekasi. It begins with the destruction of monuments until the rejection of worship places (in this case is a church) by mass organizations. These incidents occurred because the native assumed that the migrants took their territory. They concerned about the modern development brought by the migrants that caused the shrinking of local culture. The behavior of these mass organizations constituted the district that made the urban space seemed 'not inclusive' indirectly. This paper offered another alternative in urban design to reduce conflicts within the territory. We sought about the district context and reterritorialized the conflicted area. We used Reterritorialization approach to restore 'border' in order to sharpen and strengthen the territory. We conducted direct observation method, socio-cultural mapping, in-depth interview, and 3D model. This paper aimed to affirm the territory in urban space that would be able to accommodate the needs of the district user. The result is a design of transitional space that functionates as negotiation space. The transitional space is an intervention using Reterritorialization approach to reduce conflicts that occur in the urban space of the Northern part of Bekasi.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadono, W., & Herlily. (2018). Urban conflict: Reterritorialization in Northern part of Bekasi. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 126). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012207

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free