Conceptual Change and Conceptual Diversity Contribute to Progress in Science

  • Griffiths P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Key theoretical constructs are frequently defined in different ways by different practitioners. The idea of a biological species is perhaps the most famous example. The many competing ‘species concepts’ are the subject of both an enormous literature in biology (Mayden 1997) and a substantial body of commentary in the history and philosophy of science (Wilkins 2009). Such conceptual diversity is often viewed as dysfunctional, leading to miscommunication between practitioners from different fields, making their findings incommensurable with one another, and generally impeding scientific progress. For example, many have argued that the multiple meanings of the term ‘innate’ impedes progress in

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Griffiths, P. (2015). Conceptual Change and Conceptual Diversity Contribute to Progress in Science. In Change!: Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/ccaasw.07.2015.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free