Key theoretical constructs are frequently defined in different ways by different practitioners. The idea of a biological species is perhaps the most famous example. The many competing ‘species concepts’ are the subject of both an enormous literature in biology (Mayden 1997) and a substantial body of commentary in the history and philosophy of science (Wilkins 2009). Such conceptual diversity is often viewed as dysfunctional, leading to miscommunication between practitioners from different fields, making their findings incommensurable with one another, and generally impeding scientific progress. For example, many have argued that the multiple meanings of the term ‘innate’ impedes progress in
CITATION STYLE
Griffiths, P. (2015). Conceptual Change and Conceptual Diversity Contribute to Progress in Science. In Change!: Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/ccaasw.07.2015.11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.