How methodology became a toolbox-and how it escapes from that box

45Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The understanding that research methodology comprises an essential part of scientific theories about phenomena that are studied is not always brought into the center of theoretical reasoning. The inevitable connection of methodology and statements about the nature of the phenomenon studied becomes obvious when we ask for the proofs of theoretical statements about the phenomenon that a theory should explain. The only scientific way to give the proofs for a theory requires description of the research methodology-who was studied with what assessment methods and which was the exact procedure of data collection. If the analysis of the research methodology reveals questionable procedures or implicit restrictive theoretically not justified assumptions, all theory based on such a methodology must be questioned as well. © 2009 Springer-Verlag New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox-and how it escapes from that box. In Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences (pp. 45–66). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free