Long-term hearing outcomes after gamma knife surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma with hearing preservation: evaluation in 92 patients with serial audiograms

16Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The treatment strategy for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is controversial, and data concerning the long-term hearing outcomes > 5 years after gamma knife surgery (GKS) are limited. The long-term hearing outcomes after GKS were evaluated in VS patients with hearing preservation. Ninety-two VS patients with a pure tone average (PTA) ≤ 50 dB were evaluated. The median age was 54 years; the median tumor volume was 1.5 cm 3 . The tumors were treated with a median margin dose of 12 Gy and a median mean cochlear dose of 4.0 Gy. At the time of GKS, 65 patients retained a PTA of 0–30 dB, and 27 had a PTA of 31–50 dB. The median follow-up period was 106 months. At the final follow-up, 2 (2%) developed tumor progression. During the median audiogram follow-up of 83 months, the PTA was ≤ 30 dB in 22 patients (24%) and 31–50 dB in 27 patients (29%); 43 patients (47%) worsened to a PTA > 50 dB. Hearing preservation rates were 66, 57, and 44% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the mean cochlear dose (P < 0.001) and pre-GKS PTA (P = 0.045) were significant for hearing preservation. GKS was an effective treatment option for VS patients with a PTA ≤ 50 dB. As a lower cochlear dose and better pre-GKS PTA contributed to long-term hearing preservation, prophylactic GKS before hearing deterioration or tumor growth would be a treatment of choice if patients provided informed consent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasegawa, T., Kato, T., Yamamoto, T., Naito, T., Kato, N., Torii, J., & Ishii, K. (2018). Long-term hearing outcomes after gamma knife surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma with hearing preservation: evaluation in 92 patients with serial audiograms. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 138(2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2784-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free