Comparing Metal-Halide and -Oxygen Adducts in Oxidative C/O-H Activation: AuIII-Cl versus AuIII-OH

12Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High-valent metal-halides have come to prominence as highly effective oxidants. A direct comparison of their efficacy against that of traditional metal-oxygen adducts is needed. [AuIII(Cl)(terpy)](ClO4)2 (1; terpy = 2,2′:6′,2-terpyridine) readily oxidized substrates bearing O-H and C-H bonds via a hydrogen atom transfer mechanism. A direct comparison with [AuIII(OH)(terpy)](ClO4)2 (2) showed that 1 was a kinetically superior oxidant with respect to 2 for all substrates tested. We ascribe this to the greater thermodynamic driving force imbued by the Cl ligand versus the OH ligand.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lovisari, M., Gericke, R., Twamley, B., & McDonald, A. R. (2021). Comparing Metal-Halide and -Oxygen Adducts in Oxidative C/O-H Activation: AuIII-Cl versus AuIII-OH. Inorganic Chemistry, 60(20), 15610–15616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02222

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free