Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices

253Citations
Citations of this article
313Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abandoning ineffective medical practices and mitigating the risks of untested practices are important for improving patient health and containing healthcare costs. Historically, this process has relied on the evidence base, societal values, cultural tensions, and political sway, but not necessarily in that order. We propose a conceptual framework to guide and prioritize this process, shifting emphasis toward the principles of evidence-based medicine, acknowledging that evidence may still be misinterpreted or distorted by recalcitrant proponents of entrenched practices and other biases. © 2014 Ioannidis and Prasad; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prasad, V., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014, January 8). Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices. Implementation Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free