Abstract
Seamlessness, reversibility, and software contracting have been proposed as important techniques to be supported by object-oriented methods. These techniques are used to provide a framework for the comparison of two modeling languages, the Business Object Notation (BON) and the Unified Modeling Language (UML). Elements of the UML and its constraint language that do not support these techniques are discussed. Suggestions for further improvements to both BON and UML are described.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Paige, R. F., & Ostroff, J. S. (1999). A comparison of the business object notation and the unified modeling language. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1723, pp. 67–82). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46852-8_6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
