Writing and implementing successful NSF S-STEM proposals

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For over 10 years, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has been funding S-STEM proposals. The S-STEM program "makes grants to institutions of higher education to support scholarships for academically talented students demonstrating financial need, enabling them to enter the STEM workforce or STEM graduate school following completion of an associate, baccalaureate, or graduate-level degree in science, technology, engineering or mathematics disciplines1." Currently, there are 1,148 active S-STEM grants at over 580 institutions of higher education in the United States2. At the authors' institution, three separate NSF S-STEM proposals have been funded since 2011. In this paper, the authors provide specific information on the approaches they used to write and implement successful NSF S-STEM proposals. The paper also provides details on the impact these programs are having at this institution, including strategies that have been successful in engaging students, enhancing student learning, and increasing self-efficacy and retention.

References Powered by Scopus

Problem‐based learning: rationale and description

813Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature

719Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning

702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, E. C., Farwell, M. A., & Kennedy, A. M. (2015). Writing and implementing successful NSF S-STEM proposals. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25112

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘20‘21‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0