Original article: Prognostic impact of histologic demonstration of chromogranin a and neuron specific enolase in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

77Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One hundred-fourteen patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung (ACL) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies against Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) and Chromogranin A (Chr A) in order to determine the frequency and prognostic impact of such antigen expression. All patients were previously untreated and received chemotherapy according to a prospective randomized trial. The tumors of 18 patients (16%) had more than 10% positive cells stained with anti-NSE, 59 (52%) had 1-10% positive cells and those of 37 patients (32%) contained no NSE-positive cells. The corresponding figures for Chr A were: 22 patients (19%), 51 patients (45%) and 41 patients (36%), respectively. Forty-four per cent of the patients with more than 10% positive NSE cells responded to chemotherapy (either complete or partial remissions) compared to 17% of the patients with fewer than 10% positive cells (p < 0.025). The corresponding values for Chr A were 30% responders versus 19% responders (not statistically significant). The median survival for patients with more than 10%, 1-10% or no NSE-positive cells was 262 days, 231 days and 159 days, while, for Chr A it was 245 days, 200 days and 238 days, respectively. The survival curves for both NSE and Chr A according to the various levels of positivity were not significantly different. The presence of neuroendocrine marker in pulmonary adenocarcinoma seems to be associated with increased sensitivity to chemotherapy. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skov, B. G., Serensen, J. B., Hirsch, F. R., Larsson, L. I., & Hansen, H. H. (1991). Original article: Prognostic impact of histologic demonstration of chromogranin a and neuron specific enolase in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Annals of Oncology, 2(5), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free