Reflexivity

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Argumentation is reflexive, that is, it has a unique self-referential structure. As any theory of argument has to make use of arguments for its justification, argumentation theory is part of its own subject area. Moreover, ground-level argumentation and meta-argumentation proceed in a concurrent process, so that this two-leveled structure provides for the endeavor to remain open. “Rational” argument, as defined by economical or logical criteria, lacks this openness. With regard to epistemic criteria, three stages of argumentation can be specified: natural, scientific, and philosophical argumentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wohlrapp, H. R. (2014). Reflexivity. In Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning (Vol. 4, pp. 361–391). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8762-8_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free