An equivalence between attribute-based signatures and homomorphic signatures, and new constructions for both

22Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Attribute-Based Signatures (ABS; first defined by Maji, Prabhakaran and Rosulek, CT-RSA 2011) an authority can generate multiple signing keys, where each key is associated with an attribute x. Messages are signed with respect to a constraint f, such that a key for x can sign messages respective to f only if f(x) = 0. The security requirements are unforgeability and key privacy (signatures should not expose the specific signing key used). In (single-hop) Homomorphic Signatures (HS; first defined by Boneh and Freeman, PKC 2011), given a signature for a data-set x, one can evaluate a signature for the pair (f(x), f), for functions f. In context-hiding HS, evaluated signatures do not reveal information about the original (pre-evaluated) signatures. In this work we start by showing that these two notions are in fact equivalent. The first implication of this equivalence is a new lattice-based ABS scheme for polynomial-depth circuits, based on the HS construction of Gorbunov, Vaikuntanathan and Wichs (GVW; STOC 2015). We then construct a new ABS candidate from a worst case lattice assumption (SIS), with different parameters. Using our equivalence again, now in the opposite direction, our new ABS implies a new lattice-based HS scheme with different parameter trade-off, compared to the aforementioned GVW.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsabary, R. (2017). An equivalence between attribute-based signatures and homomorphic signatures, and new constructions for both. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10678 LNCS, pp. 489–518). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70503-3_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free