Two experiments were conducted to determine 1) if statistical clustering of near infrared spectra would aid in selection of samples to establish calibration equations, and 2) if broad-based calibration equations were capable of accurately determining forage quality. In Experiment 1, clustering of spectra did not have any advantage over random selection as a means to select samples. In Experiment 2, 990 hay samples representing a large diversity of species, maturity, cutting, and chemical composition, were collected from 31 states. Approximately 50% of the samples were used in this study. Samples were separated into calibration and validation sets, either on a random basis or by subset of samples from individual states into validation sets. Based on randomly selected samples, the standard error of validation and bias were dry matter (.47, −.05%); CP (.84, .06% dry matter); ADF (2.24, .18% dry matter); NDF (2.16, 17% dry matter); in vitro dry matter digestibility (30.3, −.40%). There was a trend toward increased bias for ADF, NDF, and in vitro dry matter digestibility when samples from particular states, rather than randomly selected samples, were used as validation sets. © 1987, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Abrams, S. M., Shenk, J. S., Westerhaus, M. O., & Barton, F. E. (1987). Determination of Forage Quality by near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy: Efficacy of Broad-Based Calibration Equations. Journal of Dairy Science, 70(4), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80077-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.