Silk proteins in reconstructive surgery: Do they possess an inherent antibacterial activity? A systematic review

16Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The field of reconstructive surgery encompasses a wide range of surgical procedures and regenerative approaches to treat various tissue types. Every surgical procedure is associated with the risk of surgical site infections, which are not only a financial burden but also increase patient morbidity. The surgical armamentarium in this area are biomaterials, particularly natural, biodegradable, biocompatible polymers, including the silk proteins fibroin (SF) and sericin (SS). Silk is known to be derived from silkworms and is mainly composed of 60–80% fibroin, which provides the structural form, and 15–35% sericin, which acts as a glue-like substance for the SF threads. Silk proteins possess most of the desired properties for biomedical applications, including biocompatibility, biodegradability, minimal immunogenicity, and tunable biomechanical behaviour. In an effort to alleviate or even prevent infections associated with the use of biomaterials in surgery, antibacterial/antimicrobial properties have been investigated in numerous studies. In this systematic review, the following question was addressed: Do silk proteins, SF and SS, possess an intrinsic antibacterial property and how could these materials be tailored to achieve such a property?.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering

339Citations
464Readers
318Citations
562Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schäfer, S., Aavani, F., Köpf, M., Drinic, A., Stürmer, E. K., Fuest, S., … Smeets, R. (2023, January 1). Silk proteins in reconstructive surgery: Do they possess an inherent antibacterial activity? A systematic review. Wound Repair and Regeneration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13049

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0