In search of dialogue: Staging science communication in consensus conferences

30Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Controversies about science and technology are often understood as problems of poor communication between science and society. Based on the academic tradition of studies in the public understanding of science, the chapter identifies three different models for the communicative relationship between science and its publics (the model of diffusion, the model of deliberation and the model of negotiation). The author then applies those models to the specific science communication format of the consensus conference, propagated by the Danish Board of Technology. The chapter explores how divergent expectations about the outcome of specific consensus conferences can be elucidated with the help of the three models. Depending on which model the organizers and participants subscribe to, the objective of the conference can be to enhance scientific literacy, democratic legitimation or the mediation of individual preferences. If participants do not share the same expectations about the outcome, there will be ample scope for disappointment and frustration. © 2008 Springer Netherlands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horst, M. (2008). In search of dialogue: Staging science communication in consensus conferences. In Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices (pp. 259–274). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free