Skip to main content
Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Generative AI for medical 3D printing: a comparison of ChatGPT outputs to reference standard education

  • Sriwastwa A
  • Ravi P
  • Emmert A
  • et al.
3D Printing in Medicine (2023) 9(1)
DOI: 10.1186/s41205-023-00186-8
17Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

… to incrementally provide education would be of great value. We hypothesized that Generative AI and ChatGPT, in particular, could potentially fill part of this educational void for 3D …

References Powered by Scopus

3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

PLOS Digital Health
1813Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: A systematic literature review

BioMedical Engineering Online
837Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying

Proceedings - 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence, CAI 2024
10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence and medical education: application in classroom instruction and student assessment using a pharmacology & therapeutics case study

BMC Medical Education
9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introducing AnatomyGPT: A customized artificial intelligence application for anatomical sciences education

Clinical Anatomy
7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sriwastwa, A., Ravi, P., Emmert, A., Chokshi, S., Kondor, S., Dhal, K., … Gupta, R. (2023). Generative AI for medical 3D printing: a comparison of ChatGPT outputs to reference standard education. 3D Printing in Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00186-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

33%

Researcher 5

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

46%

Engineering 3

23%

Decision Sciences 2

15%

Environmental Science 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 36

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free