Histories: Telling the Story of Where Contemporary Science Communication, This Book, and Our Own Work Come From

  • Davies S
  • Horst M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present comment examines to what extent science communication has attained the status of an academic discipline and a distinct research field, as opposed to the common view that science communication is merely a sub-discipline of media studies, sociology of science or history of science. Against this background, the authors of this comment chart the progress science communication has made as an emerging subject over the last 50 years in terms of a number of measures. Although discussions are still ongoing about the elements that must be present to constitute a legitimate disciplinary field, we show here that science communication meets four key elements that constitute an analytical framework to classify academic disciplines: the presence of a community; a history of inquiry; a mode of inquiry that defines how data is collected; and the existence of a communications network.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, S. R., & Horst, M. (2016). Histories: Telling the Story of Where Contemporary Science Communication, This Book, and Our Own Work Come From. In Science Communication (pp. 29–51). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50366-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free