Making, cloning, and the expression of human insulin genes in bacteria: The path to humulin

35Citations
Citations of this article
247Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the mid- to late 1970s, recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid methods for cloning and expressing genes in E. coli were under intense development. The important question had become: Can humans design and chemically synthesize novel genes that function in bacteria? This question was answered in 1978 and in 1979 with the successful expression in E. coli of 2 mammalian hormones, first somatostatin and then human insulin. The successful production of human insulin in bacteria provided, for the first time, a practical, scalable source of human insulin and resulted in the approval, in 1982, of human insulin for the treatment of diabetics. In this short review, I give my personal view of how the making, cloning, and expressing of human insulin genes was accomplished by a team of scientists led by Keiichi Itakura, Herbert W. Boyer, and myself.

References Powered by Scopus

Isolation of Biologically Active Ribonucleic Acid from Sources Enriched in Ribonuclease

18939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: conformation and dynamics.

1384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro

1281Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Natural products and drug discovery

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Amplifying gene expression with RNA-targeted therapeutics

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stabilization challenges and aggregation in protein-based therapeutics in the pharmaceutical industry

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Riggs, A. D. (2021, June 1). Making, cloning, and the expression of human insulin genes in bacteria: The path to humulin. Endocrine Reviews. Endocrine Society. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnaa029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

72%

Researcher 9

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 38

61%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

21%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

10%

Chemistry 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free