Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims: We investigated neurological events, graft patency, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and mortality at 1 year following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery using automated proximal anastomotic devices (APADs) and compared the overall rates with the current literature. Methods: A systematic review of all available reports of APADs use in the literature was conducted. Cumulative incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were the main statistical indexes. Nine observational studies encompassing a total of 718 patients were included at the end of the selection process. Results: The cumulative event rate of neurological complications was 4.8% (lower-upper limits: 2.8-8.0, P

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49074Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration

12313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions

6465Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Micali, L. R., Matteucci, F., Parise, O., Tetta, C., Moula, A. I., de Jong, M., … Gelsomino, S. (2019, November 1). Clinical outcomes of automated anastomotic devices: A metanalysis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14186

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

73%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

9%

Computer Science 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0