Technological Enablers 4.0 to Drive Open Science and Education: Input to UNESCO Recommendations

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The integration of technologies in education brings organizational changes not only in traditional classrooms, but also in digital platforms, and invites to locate opportunities for educational innovation. This article aims to identify the perception of 206 participants of an international Open Education (OE) program and to contribute to UNESCO’s (2019) recommendations for OE and science, with possibilities for technological enablers. The guiding questions in this study were: what are the challenges, cases, and experiences that participants perceive as drivers of OE? In what ways can technologies enable OE within the framework of UNESCO recommendations? A parallel mixed method was carried out with an initial phase analyzing qualitative and quantitative data with a perception instrument applied to the participants. The second phase comprises a literature search to locate research that uses technologies in OE and to provide an outline of technological enablers. The results were: (a) the greatest perceived challenges are “Promoting the culture of open access” and “Promoting international cooperation”; (b) 46 contributions from participants with cases to promote OE stand out and (c) contribution of six research studies to promote UNESCO’s recommendations with technologies and (d) a classification scheme of technological enablers 4.0 for education is proposed. This article is intended to be of interest to educational communities, ministries of education and science, researchers, and trainers interested in educational innovation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González-Pérez, L. I., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Technological Enablers 4.0 to Drive Open Science and Education: Input to UNESCO Recommendations. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 25(2), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.33088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free