Stimulus context and duration discrimination

14Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ability of human observers to discriminate duration was assessed in two types of tasks: (1) pulse tasks, in which the observer compared the duration of two brief increments in an ongoing sinusoid, and (2) gap tasks, in which the observer compared the duration of two brief interruptions in an ongoing sinusoid. Performance in these tasks was assessed in three different contexts: noise alone, noise plus continuous sinusoids, and noise plus continuous sinusoids chosen to induce a pitch segregation effect. Performance in the pulse task was independent of the changes in context; however, performance in the gap task changed as a function of context condition. There was a large decrement in the observers' ability to discriminate duration when the stimulus ensemble induced the pitch segregation effect. The results are discussed in terms of the relationship between duration discrimination and stimulus variations which do not carry duration information. © 1979 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Human Discrimination of Auditory Duration

430Citations
235Readers
Get full text

Duration Discrimination of Noise and Tone Bursts

163Citations
41Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
108Citations
33Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woods, D. D., Sorkin, R. D., & Boggs, G. J. (1979). Stimulus context and duration discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 26(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208306

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

55%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

9%

Neuroscience 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0