FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX plus Panitumumab for Metastatic Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: Which “Side” Are You On?

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the results of the study by Pietrantonio et al., which evaluated the clinical conundrum of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy for metastatic left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer and appears in this issue. Both FOLFOXIRI [fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan] plus bevacizumab and FOLFOX [fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin] plus panitumumab have shown impressive activity in this population; however, the two have not been directly compared. The article by Pietrantonio et al. presents a propensity score-adjusted analysis using information from five previous randomized trials and provides best available evidence comparing these regimens. This commentary will discuss their results and how their findings fit in current treatment paradigms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, I. S., & Loree, J. M. (2021, April 1). FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX plus Panitumumab for Metastatic Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: Which “Side” Are You On? Oncologist. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.13705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free