A revisited proof of the seneta-heyde norming for branching random walks under optimal assumptions

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We introduce a set of tools which simplify and streamline the proofs of limit theorems concerning near-critical particles in branching random walks under optimal assumptions. We exemplify our method by giving another proof of the Seneta-Heyde norming for the critical additive martingale, initially due to Aïdékon and Shi. The method involves in particular the replacement of certain second moment estimates by truncated first moment bounds, and the replacement of ballot-type theorems for random walks by estimates coming from an explicit expression for the potential kernel of random walks killed below the origin. Of independent interest might be a short, self-contained proof of this expression, as well as a criterion for convergence in probability of non-negative random variables in terms of conditional Laplace transforms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boutaud, P., & Maillard, P. (2019). A revisited proof of the seneta-heyde norming for branching random walks under optimal assumptions. Electronic Journal of Probability, 24. https://doi.org/10.1214/19-EJP350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free