Company financial path analysis using fuzzy c-means and its application in financial failure prediction

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic process of the company’s financial status over years and proposes to design financial path using fuzzy c-means (FCM) approach. FCM is firstly used to quantize company financial paths of behavior over consecutive years. Financial paths are deployed to depict different patterns of failure and to understand the dynamics of financial failure. Then financial failure prediction model is built based on the proposed financial path (FP) approach. Empirical experiment is carried out with data samples of Chinese listed companies. Through analyzing financial path, it is found that there are mainly four patterns of process to terminal failure. Besides, in order to validate the prediction performance of the financial path prediction model, four prevalent financial failure prediction models, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and neural network (NN), are deployed to compare with the proposed model respectively. Experimental results show that FP has significantly better financial failure performance than other four models in terms of accuracy, type I error, and type II error. Therefore, the financial path monitors the change of financial status and acts as a prediction tool for financial failure prediction, which is a significant determinant of the financial success. Managers can recognize the financial failure signal in advance and understand their evolution trend on the future. In addition, the financial path prediction model is also an effective supplement to the research field of financial failure analysis and prediction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, J., & Wu, C. (2018). Company financial path analysis using fuzzy c-means and its application in financial failure prediction. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1415959

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free