Realization theorems for justification logics: Full modularity

4Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Justification logics were introduced by Artemov in 1995 to provide intuitionistic logic with a classical provability semantics, a problem originally posed by G¨odel. Justification logics are refinements of modal logics and formally connected to them by so-called realization theorems. A constructive proof of a realization theorem typically relies on a cut-free sequent-style proof system for the corresponding modal logic. A uniform realization theorem for all the modal logics of the socalled modal cube, i.e., for the extensions of the basic modal logic K with any subset of the axioms d, t, b, 4, and 5, has been proven using nested sequents. However, the proof was not modular in that some realization theorems required postprocessing in the form of translation on the justification logic side. This translation relied on additional restrictions on the language of the justification logic in question, thus, narrowing the scope of realization theorems. We present a fully modular proof of the realization theorems for the modal cube that is based on modular nested sequents introduced by Marin and Straßburger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borg, A., & Kuznets, R. (2015). Realization theorems for justification logics: Full modularity. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9323, pp. 221–236). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free