The Ictal–Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?

30Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring is becoming increasingly used in neurologic and non-neurologic intensive care units (ICUs). Non-convulsive seizures (NCSz) and periodic discharges (PDs) are commonly seen in critically ill patients. Some of these PD patterns, also known as the ictal–interictal continuum (IIC), are associated with an increased risk of seizures and poor outcome. However, we do not fully understand the significance of these periodic patterns and the decision of how aggressively to treat remains controversial. IIC patterns are associated with pathophysiologic changes that closely resemble those of seizures. Here we make the argument that, rather than feature description on EEG, associated changes in brain physiology should dictate management choices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubinos, C., Reynolds, A. S., & Claassen, J. (2018). The Ictal–Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)? Neurocritical Care, 29(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0477-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free