Persistent homology of collaboration networks

69Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the past few decades, network science has introduced several statistical measures to determine the topological structure of large networks. Initially, the focus was on binary networks, where edges are either present or not. Thus, many of the earlier measures can only be applied to binary networks and not to weighted networks. More recently, it has been shown that weighted networks have a rich structure, and several generalized measures have been introduced. We use persistent homology, a recent technique from computational topology, to analyse four weighted collaboration networks. We include the first and second Betti numbers for the first time for this type of analysis. We show that persistent homology corresponds to tangible features of the networks. Furthermore, we use it to distinguish the collaboration networks from similar random networks. © 2013 C. J. Carstens and K. J. Horadam.

References Powered by Scopus

Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society

4424Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices

3825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The structure of scientific collaboration networks

3793Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A roadmap for the computation of persistent homology

473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks

443Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Topological Data Analysis

322Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carstens, C. J., & Horadam, K. J. (2013). Persistent homology of collaboration networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/815035

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

69%

Researcher 10

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 23

38%

Computer Science 20

33%

Physics and Astronomy 12

20%

Engineering 5

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free