The choice of methods or design languages is a crucial phase in the development of systems and software, also for real time and embedded systems. An open question that remains in the design of these types of systems is to build a method, or to choose one among those existing, capable to cover the life cycle of a project, and particularly the development phases. This article contributes to answer the question, by proposing an approach based on a multi-criteria comparative study, of few languages and methods dedicated to the design of real time and embedded systems. The underlying objective of this work is to present to designers a wide range of approaches, and elements that can guide their choices. In order to reach this goal, we propose different comparison criteria. Each criterion is divided into sub-criteria, so that the designers can refine their choices according to the qualities they prefer and wish to have in the method or language. We also define a rating scale which is used to assess the retained languages and methods. The scores obtained from this assessment are presented in tables, one table per criterion, followed by a summary table giving the overall scores. Graphics built from these tables are provided and intend to facilitate the judgement and thus the choice of the designers.
CITATION STYLE
Monthe, V. M., Nana, L., Kouamou, G. E., & Tangha, C. (2016). A Decision Support Framework for the Choice of Languages and Methods for the Design of Real Time Embedded Systems. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 09(07), 353–397. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2016.97025
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.