Detection of colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli by use of assays based on inhibition by EDTA and zeta potential

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The emergence and rapid dissemination of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli carrying the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene have created an urgent need to develop specific screening methods. In this study, we evaluated four assays based on the inhibition of MCR-1 activity by EDTA: (i) a combined-disk test (CDT) comparing the inhibition zones of colistin and colistin (10 μg) plus EDTA (100 mM); (ii) reduction of colistin MIC (CMR) in the presence of EDTA (80 μg/ml); (iii) a modified rapid polymyxin Nordmann/Poirel test (MPNP); and (iv) alteration of zeta potential (RZP = ZP≥EDTA/ZP-EDTA). We obtained encouraging results for the detection of MCR-1 in E. coli isolates recovered from human, food, and animal samples, using the following assay parameters: ≥3 mm difference in the inhibition zones between colistin disks without and with EDTA; ≥4-fold colistin MIC decrease in the presence of EDTA; RZP of ≥2.5; and the absence of metabolic activity and proliferation, indicated by unchanged color of phenol red in the presence of colistin-EDTA, in the MPNP test. In this regard, the CDT, CMR, RZP, and MPNP assays exhibited sensitivities of 96.7, 96.7, 95.1, and 96.7% and specificities of 89.6, 83.3, 100, and 100%, respectively, for detecting MCR-1-positive E. coli. Our results demonstrate that inhibition by EDTA and zeta potential assays may provide simple and inexpensive methods for the presumptive detection of MCR-1-producing E. coli isolates in human and veterinary diagnostic laboratories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esposito, F., Fernandes, M. R., Lopes, R., Muñoz, M., Sabino, C. P., Cunha, M. P., … Lincopan, N. (2017). Detection of colistin-resistant mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli by use of assays based on inhibition by EDTA and zeta potential. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 55(12), 3454–3465. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00835-17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free