A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task

8Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The lexical-decision task is among the most commonly used paradigms in psycholinguistics. In both the signal-detection theory and Diffusion Decision Model (DDM; Ratcliff, Gomez, & McKoon, Psychological Review, 111, 159–182, 2004) frameworks, lexical-decisions are based on a continuous source of word-likeness evidence for both words and non-words. The Retrieving Effectively from Memory model of Lexical-Decision (REM–LD; Wagenmakers et al., Cognitive Psychology, 48(3), 332–367, 2004) provides a comprehensive explanation of lexical-decision data and makes the prediction that word-likeness evidence is more variable for words than non-words and that higher frequency words are more variable than lower frequency words. To test these predictions, we analyzed five lexical-decision data sets with the DDM. For all data sets, drift-rate variability changed across word frequency and non-word conditions. For the most part, REM–LD’s predictions about the ordering of evidence variability across stimuli in the lexical-decision task were confirmed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tillman, G., Osth, A. F., van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Heathcote, A. (2017). A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(6), 1949–1956. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1259-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free