Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacityunlimited working memory

17Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Theories of consciousness divide over whether perceptual consciousness is rich or sparse in specific representational content and whether it requires cognitive access. These two issues are often treated in tandem because of a shared assumption that the representational capacity of cognitive access is fairly limited. Recent research on working memory challenges this shared assumption. This paper argues that abandoning the assumption undermines post-cue-based 'overflow' arguments, according to which perceptual consciousness is rich and does not require cognitive access. Abandoning it also dissociates the rich/sparse debate from the access question. The paper then explores attempts to reformulate overflow theses in ways that do not require the assumption of limited capacity. Finally, it discusses the problem of relating seemingly non-probabilistic perceptual consciousness to the probabilistic representations posited by the models that challenge conceptions of cognitive access as capacity-limited. This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gross, S. (2018). Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacityunlimited working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1755). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0343

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free