Diagnostic performance of the simultaneous acquisition rest 99 mTc-tetrofosmin/stress201Tl dual-isotope protocol with a semiconductor camera: Comparison with the rest-stress 99 mTc-tetrofosmin protocol

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This study compared the diagnostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between the rest-stress99 m Tc-tetrofosmin protocol (Tc/Tc protocol) and simultaneous acquisition rest99 mTc-tetrofosmin/stress201Tl dual-isotope protocol (SDI protocol) with a semiconductor camera. Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied 147 patients who underwent stress MPI using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera and invasive coronary angiography within a 3-month interval. The Tc/Tc and SDI protocols were used in 59 and 88 patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the summed difference score in per-patient analysis were 56%, 85%, and 69%, respectively, for the Tc/Tc protocol and 89%, 82%, and 85%, respectively, for the SDI protocol. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly better for the SDI than Tc/Tc protocol for the left anterior descending artery (0.836 vs. 0.674; P=0.0380), the left circumflex artery (0.754 vs. 0.599; P=0.0441), and in per-patient analysis (0.875 vs. 0.707; P=0.0135). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of the summed stress score for any vessel or in per-patient analysis between the 2 protocols. Conclusions: The SDI protocol had a higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary ischemia than the Tc/Tc protocol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawamura, I., Kajiura, R., Motoji, Y., Okamoto, S., Tanigaki, T., Omori, H., … Matsuo, H. (2018). Diagnostic performance of the simultaneous acquisition rest 99 mTc-tetrofosmin/stress201Tl dual-isotope protocol with a semiconductor camera: Comparison with the rest-stress 99 mTc-tetrofosmin protocol. Circulation Journal, 82(11), 2837–2844. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0363

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free