Left-handedness and time pressure in elite interactive ball games

28Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

According to the fighting hypothesis, frequency-dependent selection gives relatively rarer left-handers a competitive edge in duel-like contests and is suggested as one mechanism that ensured the stable maintenance of handedness polymorphism in humans. Overrepresentation of left-handers exclusively in interactive sports seems to support the hypothesis. Here, by referring to data on interactive ball sports, I propose that a left-hander's advantage is linked to the sports' underlying time pressure. The prevalence of left-handers listed in elite rankings increased from low (8.7%) to high (30.39%) time pressure sports and a distinct left-hander overrepresentation was only found in the latter (i.e. baseball, cricket and table tennis). This indicates that relative rarity and the interactive nature of a contest are not sufficient per se to evoke a left-hander advantage. Refining the fighting hypothesis is suggested to facilitate prediction and experimental verification of when and why negative frequency-dependent selection may benefit left-handedness.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Human handedness: A meta-analysis

304Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual-level and population-level lateralization: Two sides of the Same Coin

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Brain and Behavioral Asymmetry: A Lesson From Fish

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loffing, F. (2017). Left-handedness and time pressure in elite interactive ball games. Biology Letters, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0446

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

23%

Researcher 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

40%

Psychology 7

28%

Neuroscience 4

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 31
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0