A Comparison of Strategies for Recruiting Teachers Into Survey Panels

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examine a range of options for recruiting teachers into a nationally representative survey panel. Recruitment strategies considered include a telephone-based approach and the use of promised incentives and pre-incentives of varying amounts and forms. Using a randomized experiment, we evaluate the effectiveness of five separate recruitment strategies and conduct a cost-benefit analysis. Our preferred strategy is one that uses a US$10 gift card as pre-incentive (it yielded a 27% rate of successful recruitment a cost of US$78 per recruited teacher). Statistical comparisons indicate that no other technique was superior to this strategy in terms of recruitment rate or cost-effectiveness. Efforts at refusal conversion after the initial approach were mostly ineffective. A comparison across demographic type characteristics of enrolled panelists and nonrespondents shows no substantial differences for any recruitment strategy considered. Hence, the potential for recruitment-level nonresponse to induce large bias into findings from surveys administered to the panel is minimal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robbins, M. W., Grimm, G., Stecher, B., & Opfer, V. D. (2018). A Comparison of Strategies for Recruiting Teachers Into Survey Panels. SAGE Open, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018796412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free