I have shown how the social imaginary (and the role of the imagination and consequent actions) can be 22 better explicated using the ontology behind a theory of practice. This involves conceptualising structures and actions separately, as a heuristic device, while also always understanding them as interacting in practice. I have thus drawn on the distinction between external structures, internalised structures, practices, communities of practice, active agency, and outcomes as a way of bringing more precision to our understanding of the role of the imagination and to both the social structural and the creative aspects of imagining.
CITATION STYLE
O’Reilly, K. (2014). The Role of the Social Imaginary in Lifestyle Migration: Employing the Ontology of Practice Theory. In Understanding Lifestyle Migration (pp. 211–234). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328670_10
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.