Corporate social responsibility information disclosure and corporate fraud-"risk reduction" effect or "window dressing" effect?

18Citations
Citations of this article
158Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examine the impact in Chinese capital markets of publishing information on corporate fraud in a corporate social responsibility (CSR) report. We develop and test two competing hypotheses of "risk reduction" and "window dressing". Based on the listed company's CSR report, we analyze the effect of CSR disclosure on the commission of corporate fraud, fraud detection and the severity of corporate fraud. The research results show that after controlling for the firms' characteristics and corporate governance factors, the CSR report's information disclosures have a significantly negative relation to corporate fraud. Specifically, the CSR report's publication reduces the information asymmetry between the insiders and the stakeholders, thus decreasing the tendency to commit fraud. Our findings support the risk reduction hypothesis but not the window dressing hypothesis. Further research shows that firms with a good CSR disclosure practice have a lower probability of committing corporate fraud and have fewer types of fraud violations, thereby mitigating the severity of corporate fraud.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, H., Dou, B., & Wang, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility information disclosure and corporate fraud-"risk reduction" effect or “window dressing” effect? Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free