Standardized gait speed ratio in elderly patients with heart failure

18Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: Although aging is strongly associated with both heart failure and a decline in gait speed, a definition of slowness incorporating an age-related decline has yet to be developed. We aimed to define an event-driven cut-off for the relative decline in gait speed against age-adjusted reference values derived from the general population and evaluate its prognostic implications. Methods and results: Standardized gait speed (SGS) was defined as the median gait speed stratified by age, sex, and height in 3777 elderly (age ≥ 65 years) individuals without a history of cardiovascular diseases (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology-Longitudinal Interdisciplinary Study on Aging: general population cohort). The mortality event-driven optimal cut-off of the SGS ratio (actual gait speed divided by the respective SGS) was defined using FRAGILE-HF cohort data and externally validated using Kitasato cohort data, comprising 1301 and 1247 hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure, respectively. Using FRAGILE-HF data, the optimal SGS ratio cut-off was determined as 0.527. In the Kitasato cohort, SGS ratio < 0.527 was associated with a higher 1 year [hazard ratio (HR): 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–2.72, P = 0.024] and long-term (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05–2.02, P = 0.024) mortality rate, independent of pre-existing covariates. Conclusions: Gait speed was significantly declined in patients with heart failure, even after taking age and sex-related decline into account. A SGS ratio of 0.527 is a validated cut-off for slowness independently associated with mortality in patients with heart failure age ≥65.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozawa, T., Yamashita, M., Seino, S., Kamiya, K., Kagiyama, N., Konishi, M., … Matsue, Y. (2021). Standardized gait speed ratio in elderly patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Failure, 8(5), 3557–3565. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13392

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free