Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. mirtazapine for chronic fatigue and neurasthenia: Randomised placebo-controlled trial

19Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. Aims: To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme compared with placebo-controlled mirtazapine medication in patients with chronic fatigue, and to study the effect of combined medication and CCBT. Method: A three-armed randomised clinical trial of mirtazapine, placebo and a CCBT programme was conducted to investigate treatment effect in a patient group (n=72) with chronic fatigue referred to a specialist clinic. The CCBT programme was compared with mirtazapine or placebo therapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks treatment with a mixed crossover-combination design. Assessments were done at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Results: By 12 weeks the treatment effect was significantly better in the group initially receiving CCBT, as assessed with the Fatigue Scale (P=0.014) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.001). By 24 weeks the treatment group initially receiving CCBT for 12 weeks followed by mirtazapine for 12 weeks showed significant improvement compared with the other treatment groups on the Fatigue Scale (P<0.001) and the Clinical Global impression Scale (P=0.002). Secondary outcome measures showed overall improvement with no significant difference between treatment groups. Conclusions: Multimodal interventions may have positive treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome. Sequence of interventions seem to be of importance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stubhaug, B., Lie, S. A., Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2008). Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. mirtazapine for chronic fatigue and neurasthenia: Randomised placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 192(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free